Welcome to Our Website

Patch modern conflict 2 hack tool

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION MANUAL

This is the Modern Conflict 2 Hack, cheats, tool, trainer % working on android and iOS. Kinguin - global digital marketplace that sells game keys with instant delivery 24/7. You can use any AutoCAD Commands in a script.

World in Conflict Mods, Maps, Patches & News

New stores are hard to come by. Employees want salary raises. Scenario 2 You are the finance manager of a relatively new US based IT company with global presence that has developed a service which had quickly grown in demand and is a well known favourite of the analyst community. Modern Conflict 2 Hack generator just require 3 minutes to get unlimited resources and get free In-App.

Crack {Tested} MS Office 2020 Product key Free Activator For you

Conflict Resolution – Professional Communications. This Modern Conflict 2 Hack engine is the key cheat to give you unlimited resources and [HOST] a superstar in the game with the aid of Modern Conflict 2 Hack engine. You can use the gods generated by Modern Conflict 2 Hack cheats tool.

20 best alternatives to DiffMerge as of 2020

The workplace continues to evolve in order to meet the needs of both employees and employers. Europe was a capitalist society where the rich upper class called the. This thread is locked.

Activation code paraphrase Online - The Best Free Paraphrasing Tool & Text

Omnisphere 2 cinematic is a third installment. Merge conflicts are going to happen on teams of any size, given enough time. MODERN CONFLICT 2 HACK CHEAT TOOL FOR ANDROID & iOS MODERN CONFLIT 2 HACK OUTIL DE FRAUDE pour Android et iOS Modernes conflits 2 hacks.

Serial Number Rups 2020 Software

How media can be an instrument of peace in conflict-prone. GRUB 2 utilities create a temporary device map on the fly, which is usually sufficient, particularly on single-disk systems. Fame and fortune await brave adventurers in this free 3D multiplayer game.

Activation key modern Conflict 2 – Action Android Games Download Free

The problem is caused by neither person, but they do need to work together to resolve it. 100 Activities for Teaching Research Methods. Position 2: looking and examining the position of the other person Position 3: taking the position of a.

Serial and UART Tutorial

Get Free Activated Software - Download Free Software https://kaksdelatcvetok.ru/download/?file=1704. See more ideas about Adobe tutorials, Adobe illustrator tutorials, Futuristic shoes. Here are some conflict of interest examples to show how it works in practice.

Cracked conflict in Society: Definition, Causes, Types and other

Barki Corporation: Free Download World in Conflict Modern https://kaksdelatcvetok.ru/download/?file=1720. You can be sure that you will be one of the best player after use this hack. To avoid confusion, I recommend to create a shortcut for both exe files and rename them to "BFBC2 Mod Loader Client" & "BFBC2 Mod Loader Server" for example.

Free Fl Studio 20 Serial Key

The modern workplace environment has a blended workforce, is becoming more responsive to problems, and less tied down to physical locations. Town of Falmouth POSITION APPLYING FOR site link. Modern conflict 2 hack tool.

Quadcopter Simulink Model

Key takeaways and further reading. Conflict is a disagreement, contest or dispute between people who differ in their ideas, needs, goals, values or beliefs. Get Shadow Fight 2 Hack Here we provide for free without surveys or without a password.

Activity code conflict Resolution - Management Training From MindTools.com

Clean install Windows 10 on HP laptop with Windows 10. Through conflict management skills, an individual explores all the possible reasons to worry which might later lead to a big problem and tries to resolve it as soon as. Federalism: A Tool for Conflict Resolution? - 50 Shades of.

Keygen tools [Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2]

The long, arduous task of gaining search engine dominance in your niche just got a whole lot easier! Contact the manufacturer of your system to confirm whether your specific model can support a secondary display or not. They are suitable for KS2 students.

Conflict theory (video)

Once the process is completed, go ahead and restart your. We are grateful for your suggestions and comments. Modern Conflict 2 Hack v Cheats App iOS/Android Pirater We offer your especially new tool Modern Conflict 2 Ch.

Download connecting Two Routers Within One Network: Boosting Wi-Fi

Registration key secrets – that agents use to connect to the Gradle Enterprise server – can be generated in the Gradle. Typically, traditional supply chains use paper based and disjointed data systems that lead to information silos and make tracking products a time consuming task. Reading: Conflict Perspective on Media and Technology https://kaksdelatcvetok.ru/download/?file=1716.

Remove Leftover Office Registry Keys - MS Office

Downloads - Modern Conflict mod for Battlefield 2 - Mod DB

Different from torrent movie download sites, the movie downloader is 100% clean, no ads, no virus, no malware. World in Conflict is a real-time strategy pursuing an alternative history starting in 1989. References must be listed in the alphabetical order, not in the order of citation.

Spinbot.com - Article Spinning, Text Rewriting, Content

Medal of Honor 2020 Limited Edition v1.0 Crack With Serial. Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. Modernization theory is used to explain the process of modernization within societies.

Why Nahiri Is Magic's Most Interesting Planeswalker (IMHO!)

I saw an interesting comment on today's story article thread about "the way the fandom misunderstands Nahiri's character and is quick to call her a villain." Since Nahiri is my favorite Planeswalker, I wanted to talk about why that is, and why I see her differently from both her detractors and also many of her fans.
This essay is super long, so:
TL;DR: Nahiri is interesting to me because her power is unique in modern Magic storytelling, centered around creative toolkmaking and big-picture ambition, and her personal struggle is highly compelling. In contrast, I am much less interested in the debate on the ethics of her actions.
I'll try my best to reply to any conversational comments that show up, but I work pretty long hours so apologies if I don't get to everyone!
~~~ It Depends on Your Point of View
First of all, I don't think that the "fandom misunderstands Nahiri's character." The people who write her off as an irredeemably evil villain are simply seeing Nahiri with their own eyes, using their own, personal sense of ethics, and their own choice of what to focus on.
I can disagree with them, but I can't say they're wrong. I can only say that they use a different set of ethics from my own, and focus on different details of the story. To me, she's not an evil character, but it's also not interesting to me to explore whether she's evil or not. (Though I'll talk about this a little at the end.)
Artificer with a Vision: The Tale of Humanity
For me, the main appeal of Nahiri comes from her history and the nature of her power. Of all the living Planeswalkers, no one other than Ugin has a stronger mastery of leylines and the physics of mana. With this mastery, Nahiri can shape entire planes! She can do this even in the post-Mending era, as we saw on Innistrad. That's extraordinary, and awe-inspiring.
And the way Nahiri does it is even cooler. It's the same thing that makes engineers more interesting to me than superheroes: Instead of channeling magic goop out of her fingers or whatever, Nahiri builds tools, and these tools amplify her agency by orders of magnitude. To this day, Nahiri's hedrons litter Zendikar and are one of the iconic emblems of the game.
This is the human story in a nutshell: Our bodies may be small and weak, but through our tools we can achieve anything.
Nahiri Stands Alone
No other Planeswalker does this. Wizards is kind of timid with its post-Mending Planeswalkers, preferring to characterize them as nervous, self-doubting, and usually not very ambitious. Jace and especially Nissa are in the same general ballpark of raw leyline mastery as Nahiri is, but they don't build tools and don't have a vision of reshaping the world. Well, pre-revisionist Nissa did, but that was a long time ago. And I guess you could argue that they came pretty close to this kind of grand vision when they decided to form the Gatewatch, which is greater than the sum of its parts. But the Gatewatch is essentially a reactionary, defensive force, and isn't structured to try and change the Multiverse for the better.
This lack of vision vastly limits their considerable power. Consider Saheeli, one of the few other modern toolmaking Planeswalkers: Even though Saheeli is likely a good deal weaker in a fight than most of the big-name Planeswalkers (including the Gatewatch), her Planar Portal nearly changed the fate of the entire Multiverse. Engineers are OP! But, unlike Nahiri, Saheeli doesn't apply her toolkmaking power to shape planes deliberately. She too lacks a grander vision.
If you put together a leyline master like Nissa, and a master artificer like Saheeli, a sense of the big picture like Ugin, and a strong ambition like Liliana...you get Nahiri! This is what makes her unique in all of Magic's modern storytelling. She's like the living heir to the legacy of Urza--another deeply problematic, meddling Planeswalker who took fate into his own hands and mowed over a lot of people in the process, yet was very compelling as a character.
Sadly, this aspect of Nahiri has been missing so far in Zendikar Rising. Nahiri still wants to shape the world, but she's been reduced to chasing down other people's artifacts rather than building or rehabilitating her own. I wish they had chosen a plot more befitting of her character.
The Numerous Ethical Controversies of Nahiri the Lithomancer
Okay, so I can't really avoid this completely.
People who hate Nahiri usually focus on her actions on Innistrad in terms of the death toll and the damage she caused, and are quick to dismiss the many mitigating circumstances that paint Nahiri in a more favorable (or less unfavorable) light. Like I said earlier, that's not wrong per se, but it is...narrow.
On the other hand, people who defend Nahiri usually gloss over the magnitude of her crimes and resort to rationalizing what she did, either by talking about Nahiri's compromised mental state (i.e., her grief, guilt, and rage) or about her nature as a pre-Mending Planeswalker (i.e., a demigod who values life differently from us mere mortals--the same way we don't think of using ant spray as genocide). This is a little more acceptable to me, but still flawed. Nahiri is much less interesting to me if I conceive of her as mentally compromised. I prefer to think of her as sane. Wounded, but sane.
There's no denying the destruction that Nahiri caused on Innistrad--and is causing again on Zendikar. There's no denying that she has blinders on, that her judgment is compromised, and that--much like the Year 2020--Nahiri really just needs to eat a friggin' Snickers already.
At the same time, however, I don't really care about the ethical debate. I just don't. For one thing, it's fiction, and in fiction we get to choose which ideas we focus on. We don't have to worry about anybody actually getting hurt. It's not that I don't care about the fictional death toll. I loved characters like Avacyn and Gisela, and Innistrad is probably my favorite plane. It's just that "story happens," the world changes, and life goes on.
If You Find Yourself in Hell, Keep Moving
For another thing, if I'm being honest, I kinda do buy the argument that some people are naturally worthier of making big decisions and taking consequential actions on behalf of others. I'm old-school like that. Until very recently, most human storytelling assigned greater moral weight to kings, gods, parental figures, religious leaders, the wealthy, etc. And while I don't agree with the premise that things like wealth or age or a high social status confer superior judgment, I do think that one can cultivate superior judgment through curiosity, open-mindedness, intelligence, discovery, creation, experience, compassion, and accountability.
Sure enough, Nahiri has been down that road. We sometimes forget just how good-hearted she was in the past. She really cared, and she took her responsibilities very seriously. She earned the wisdom that justified her power.
(Interestingly, I think Jace, after his experiences on Ixalan, has also earned his stripes in that respect. I have a lot more respect for him now than I used to.)
And then Nahiri suffered incredible misfortune at the hands of the arrogant Sorin, and everything spiraled out of control. And her story arc since then has been an exploration of what happens when a great person is dealt an unbearable loss.
That's the other part of what makes Nahiri interesting to me. She's this great figure--a powerful, ancient Planeswalker whose heart always was and still is in the right place--who is nevertheless doing everything wrong, causing a lot of harm, and suffering from incredible bad luck. She's going through hell, and I'm really interested in the journey of great people through terrible adversity. It's also why I hope she defeats this darkness someday, prevails over her own personal grief and loss, and restores the wisdom that has eluded her ever since her release from the Helvault.
After all, if someone like Nahiri can't do it, what hope is there for the rest of us? Good stories help us to make sense of our own lives. That's why characters like Bolas hold no interest for me. They're just cartoonishly evil. I can't relate to that. Real characters have real problems, and deal with those problems, and in so doing teach they us how to live better lives ourselves.
What I Hope for Nahiri in the Future
Nahiri is unique in Magic due to her mixture of vast knowledge and experience, her strong self-confidence, her incredible ambition, and most of all her genius in recognizing the importance of building tools as a way of achieving one's dreams. I wish we had more characters like this in modern storytelling, because it's really interesting to see a strong-willed protagonist whose power is that she changes the world for the better by creating things.
That's what I hope we see more of from Nahiri in the future: a triumph over her personal darkness, the reawakening of her wisdom and sense of perspective, and a restoration of this awesome pre-Mending Planeswalker who creates. She would be a powerful ally in the coming fight against the Phyrexians, and in the Multiverse's many other conflicts that lie ahead.
submitted by Emu_on_the_Loose to magicTCG

Hypothesis: Bigfoot is not Gigantopithecus nor a Hominin

Hypothesis: Bigfoot is not Gigantopithecus nor a Hominin

https://preview.redd.it/xd7jowsjuus51.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=b20bfb044819f7ad188d2176e6e386d40891cba5
The debate over the identity of certain reported unidentified, large, bipedal, furry primates has ensued for as long as the possibility of such beings existing was debated. Whether or not entities like Sasquatch exist or not is beside the point of this exercise. Rather this is a thought based deep dive into the subject meant to speculate as to the identity of such creatures as if they were real animals that were verified tomorrow and my prediction on what they would turn out to be if we could genetically test them or uncover their fossil record. Frankly, I’m much of an agnostic on the whole thing, always open to the possibility while giving everything multiple grains of salt; but I will be treating it quite seriously both because of the respectability owed to some of the individuals involved such as Lyle Blackburn, Loren Coleman, and Dr. Jeff Meldrum among other men and women, and my own personal fascination with the subject matter.
For the sake of simplicity, I will be working off several assumptions.
Firstly, contrary to some hypotheses I will assume that there is only one species of unidentified large bipedal primate, of which they are a type of ape. I know many have posited the suggestion of multiple Sasquatch types, but I will be working on the assumption reports seeming to indicate wildly divergent body types were a result of mistakes in recollection by the witnesses. Under stress and surprise, the brain is very shoddy at making accurate recollections, as psychological testing on first responders, soldiers, and people involved in armed robbery among other stressful situations all show. This is not me calling any of these witnesses liars, just that the brain is not a perfect repository for information. It’s just not how memory works. Secondly, I will be calling all of the unknown bipedal primates Sasquatch and focusing on North America for the sake of brevity. In theory, this would apply to many places around the world, but I only have so much time in the day.
Now the two main hypotheses I put forth as to the identity of Sasquatch, should it be a real unknown entity, is that it is either a relic hominin or a descendent of Gigantopithecus. Both of these have perks, however, I feel both of them have glaring weaknesses very few think to delve into. As well as traits in conflict with what is reported in Sasquatch most commonly.
First off for the relic hominin hypothesis. This thought posits that Sasquatch is a species very close to mankind and possibly even in the same genus, Homo. The problem here is a difference in brain activity and physicality. While Sasquatch has human-like features, many of these features can be chalked up to shared traits found across all apes. Moreover, there are multiple traits never seen within that group, such as a well-defined midtarsal break. Within most Hominins, the foot has a degree of rigidity passed the most basal members like Ardipithecus. This allows the foot to take a lot of abuse by walking long distances over relatively flat terrain. It’s a very useful trait for navigating the African savanna and really grew into prominence after we departed from the trees into a more open country. Essentially it trades flexibility and speed for stamina, reducing the amount of energy needed for walking long distance over flat terrain. Sasquatch footprints however show clear flex in the midline of the foot, something also seen in multiple witness reports describing it as having ‘floppy’ feet. Another problem is the size. With no real exception, Hominin don’t get any bigger than your average modern human. There were a few very short-lived populations of noticeably tall Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergansis, however, these were aberrations and the average height really wasn’t all that big. In fact, modern people are typically noticeably taller than a vast majority of Hominins. Your average Australopithecus would barely come up to a typical American man’s chest.
Hominins also lack multiple features frequently mentioned with Sasquatch reports, such as a very well-defined sagittal crest and large canine teeth. These traits had actually left the human genome very early on, and are one of the reasons we were able to grow a much larger brain. Paranthropus was the only Hominin to have any form of a sagittal crest and even there’s were extremely small. Not to mention the diet really would match up as a vast majority of Hominins are herbivores whereas many Sasquatch reports pretty clearly show it’s omnivorous. The only omnivorous Hominins are those that are fairly close to humanity, which means they would have no sagittal crest, very humanlike builds with well defined midtarsal break past the very earliest forms, and most noticeably they wouldn’t have any fur. Hominins largely ditched body fur as far back as 2 million years ago at the very start of the Homo genus proper. Aside from maybe Homo habilis, every other member of our genus has been just as naked as we are.
Sasquatch being a Hominin also doesn’t make much sense when you consider they also lack clearly defined Hominin mental faculties and necessities such as mastery of fire and advanced tool use. If they had these ‘vestiges of humanity’ if you so call them, they would be reported far more often.
Gigantopithecus is the other most common culprit for a possible Sasquatch ancestor. And to some degree, it does make a bit more sense. As a non-Hominin ape, Gigantopithecus of course would be covered in thick fur. As a very large ape, it would almost certainly have a sagittal crest as such features are common on large apes. It did live in Asia which did have a land bridge connection to North America. At one point it was thought that it was a biped. And as its name implies, the genus was certainly a very large ape and would be more than big enough to fit the reported size range of 7-9 feet for most sightings.
This however is where the similarities stop and the problems start stacking up.


Processing img 0n8y850utrs51...
Firstly Gigantopithecus was a Ponginae member, or Asiatic great ape. What this means is it is very closely related to the orangutan, and given certain traits we see in orangutans appear distributed across the whole of the Asiatic great ape family, we can assume Gigantopithecus what had similar traits. This means probably having those big gigantic cheeks flanges male orangutans are so commonly known for; something I have never seen reported in a Sasquatch sighting. Orangutans also have a very distinct nasal shape that is different than other apes, a side effect of their sinus cavity is arranged uniquely. Fun fact, they actually suffer from sinus infections far less commonly than African apes because they can more effectively discharge and eject infected mucus rather than risking clogs.
Another problem is the notion that Gigantopithecus was a biped has encountered more and more problems over time. While the full body is not known, in no small part thanks to scavengers destroying most of the remains, the shape of the jaw shows a condition far more like that of quadrupedal apes than bipedal forms. Essentially the shape of the lower jaw can indicate the shape and alignment of the throat, which is going to be different between the two locomotion forms and stances. All known Asiatic great apes are quadrupedal and there is no real reason to think Gigantopithecus was any different.
The biggest hurdle however is diet. Gigantopithecus is essentially a bigger Asiatic version of a gorilla. Purely vegetarian, with a variety of foods including fruits like figs as well as forestry grasses like bamboo. While the diet was varied enough that it did enjoy a range of different plans all studies indicate it was only consuming low-lying plans found in tropical and semitropical environments; shunning more temperate zones. Essentially Gigantopithecus didn’t like the cold and didn’t eat anything that grew where it got cold. While it wasn’t a bamboo specialist as some previously hypothesized, it certainly wasn’t living in many areas away from tropical bamboo forests. The depiction of King Louis from the 2016 jungle book remake as a tropical forest-dwelling Gigantopithecus is, timing aside, quite accurate to how the real creature probably looked and behaved… No word yet if they had voices like Christopher Walken however.


https://reddit.com/link/ja4nlj/video/1x3z9jowtrs51/player

And thus we come to the avenue I have considered. Now this one I fully admit is not without flaw and there are perks to the previous two hypotheses I did not discuss for the sake of brevity, however, there are some noticeable perks I haven’t witnessed others considering. It is thus in my conclusion that if Sasquatch is indeed real, genetic testing which shows it is not a great ape (Hominidae) at all. Rather it would be an extraordinarily large member of the other branch to the modern apes, the world’s biggest Hylobatidae. And in this scenario where the new largest living ape is discovered, it would actually be the smallest living apes, the gibbons, that our Sasquatch’s closest kin.
Gibbons, the Hylobatidae group of apes, diverged away from the ancestor of great apes roughly 16 million years ago in Asia. For apes in descending order of relation to man have chimpanzees and bonobos as our closest cousins, followed by gorillas as fellow African apes (Homininae), then the rest of great apes with the Asiatic orangutan (Ponginae), and only outside of great apes proper you have the “Lesser Apes” called gibbons. They are called that more in relation to size as the largest gibbon, the siamang, weighs only about 30 pounds.
However if one looks past size and arboreal habits, one might start to notice telling similarities between the reported North American ape and the gibbon.
Exhibit A: The Walk
All apes are capable of bipedal locomotion to some degree or another. However aside from man, all of the great apes noticeably struggle staying upright for any long length of time. And when they do, they can’t exactly run with a good stride and often need to resort to a side to side shuffling. One can see a gorilla doing such in this comical video.

https://i.redd.it/rexbs3e7yrs51.gif
Gibbons however are capable of keeping up a good pace on the ground with a full stride free of such wobbles.

https://reddit.com/link/ja4nlj/video/xzdk8450urs51/player
In fact, Gibbons are the only living apes aside from humans that exclusively move around bipedally went on the ground, they do not knuckle walk or fist walk like other apes. And they managed to walk bipedally even with having flexible feet with a metatarsal break. Sound familiar?

https://preview.redd.it/tteifj91urs51.jpg?width=682&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c33750611e8a7cf81dc5c8fb4a1ccb396b6ccad6
Now you might notice the gibbon in this video does not swing his arms back and forth, however, there is a simple explanation for this with size. Gibbons are very light and thus they don’t have much inertia when undergoing movement at moderate speed. This means they don’t have to swing their arms back and forth to compensate for balance like we often do when moving at a brisk pace. If you were to make a gibbon the size of a man they would have to do this too.
Exhibit B: The Body
The lack of a sagittal crest in Gibbons is also explainable by size. Sagittal crests are not seen in all but the absolute biggest chimpanzees and bonobos, and are even missing in the smaller individuals of the gorilla and orangutan species. It’s just a matter of observation that once apes reach a certain size they start needing to have sagittal crests to anchor the enlarged jaw muscles. Comparing the skull of the smaller Lars Gibbon to the larger Siamang Gibbon can also show the latter does half the startings of a raised sagittal ridge. So once again hypothetically, if a gibbon were much larger they would also have a sagittal crest because of the enlarged jaw muscles.

Lar gibbon (5kg) skull

Siamang gibbon (14kg) skull

Another factor is sexual dimorphism or lack thereof. Many reports with both male and female Sasquatch present typically state there’s only a moderate size difference between the two. More often the main difference would be coloration with females often reported as being lighter in color and only moderately smaller. This runs completely contrary to great apes, whereas outside of humans there are substantial size differences between males and females. Male gorillas might weigh twice as much as their female compatriots. A big reason for this is the reproductive strategy employed.
Orangutans are largely solitary, with one male roaming a big territory where he might have several females intersecting his domain and he defends his claim from rival males as well as aggressive females; should he feel the need. Chimpanzees and bonobos live in mixed-gender social groups were both sexes might compete quite vigorously for mates and polygamy and polyandry are quite common. Gorillas live in mostly female harems of one silverback and a few subordinate blackbacks tending to a group of females' needs in exchange for reproductive success.
Gibbons however are almost exclusively monogamous or practice only very limited polyandry or polygamy in a trio. This means there isn’t intense competition for mates one way or another, which is what drives the sexual dimorphism in great apes. Without that drive, Gibbons don’t need to be very dimorphic and thus females are only marginally smaller than males. One thing they are however is they almost always are a different color, with males typically being much darker and females being lighter. This also means family groups usually never exceed four individuals, they don’t move about in big troops like gorillas and chimpanzees do and thus population densities are very small even over big areas. And unlike other apes aside from man, the father gibbon plays a constant and very large role in raising his sons and daughters. A family unit, when in the same location, often consists of the parents, the growing juvenile or subadult from a prior mating cycle, and perhaps a youngster from a later year.
Sound familiar? It should because this is precisely the system described in encounters of families of Sasquatch, such as that of Albert Ostman.


A typical gibbon family. Mother (left), father (right), and baby

Gibbons also have far less-protruding faces than great apes, more closely resembling humans unless inspected closer. They do still however have noticeable canine teeth with big blocky incisors. This once again more closely matches up with reports of Sasquatch, versus the extremely large jaws and protruding semi-muzzle found in great apes living and extinct. In fact, at a distance it would make them look even more human, explaining why eyewitness reports frequently state they have very humanlike faces. Gibbons also typically have a short mane of fur growing over the collar and shoulders, which hangs down over a similarly furry chest, meaning they don’t have the bare pectorals great apes do. This further matches descriptions of Sasquatch, including the infamous Patterson film which does not show bare breasts on males or females.


Compare the faces of a gibbon and orangutan

Exhibit C: The Habits
Another thing that set Gibbons apart from most apes is how vocal they are. All apes emit sounds, but Gibbons are especially talkative. This is because they are living in mated pairs that need to keep communication over a long distance, as they patrol a territory for both resources as well is keeping away rivals. Such communication typically entails long, wailing, siren-like calls or whoops which can carry for a very long distance. Calls that great apes are largely not known to make. However, if you take those calls and modify them as if they were coming out of a much larger animal, which entails slowing them down and adding some reverberation, observe….

Audio Link

It starts sounding very familiar to some things that other people have reported hearing. This also corroborates with many reports stating they heard an initial call and then a response from a distance away, which is very common in forests with Gibbons with one partner calling out and then its mate replying.
Gibbons also match up with diet as they are the most omnivorous of all apes besides humans. While they do mostly enjoy plant matter such as fruits and softer leaves, they will also consume large insects, bird eggs, lizards, and even birds or bats they can catch in the treetops. And while they don’t catch them given they very rarely to send to the ground where they are at risk of predators, they will readily accept fish or raw meat offered to them by humans should they feel the desire. In this way, they are the most generalized apes when it comes to diet, something that would be very handy in adapting to different climates.


https://i.redd.it/xe35gcghurs51.gif
Now does this necessarily mean Sasquatch is a “Giant Ground Gibbon”? Not necessarily. Gibbons are very clearly extremely specialized animals adapted for living in the canopy, with maneuverability and speed unmatched in the treetops outside of flying animals. This is one of the reasons they don’t go on the ground that often is they are just much better in the trees. Rather what I am implying is a hypothesis that Gibbons and Sasquatch share a common ancestor. This common ancestor was an ape that might have lived some 15-10 million years ago, a very generalized early Hylobatid, who was fairly adept in the trees already but could also move about on the ground quite easily in its bipedal stance. Some of these animals’ descendants doubled down on living in the treetops, becoming more and more specialized swinging through the canopy and thus reduced in size so they put less strain on the trees they could then move through more swiftly. These descendants became modern Gibbons.
However, what if there was another descendant line that didn’t go extinct? Living in eastern Asia, the northern fringes of this line would be confronted with climate change and competition from great apes over time in the tropical forests. To avoid this competition, it became better and better at living in colder regions such as deciduous forests and mountains. Its bipedal stance suited it well for both intimidating rivals, scaring predators, reaching resources, and getting up uneven terrain with its metatarsal break giving it flexible feet. This Hylobatid, in reaction to the colder climates of the oncoming ice ages, started to get larger and larger because bigger animals can better insulate themselves against the cold. This way they could remain in the more temperate regions without fear of being driven back into the tropics where competition with great apes might complicate things. A larger size might also be further promoted as a reaction to predation since they might now be too big to easily climb up trees and would then have to stand and confront an attacker. This choice in habitat also is why the fossils would be extremely rare or unrecognizable, as deciduous forests and mountains are infamously bad at creating fossils due to a combination of factors, not the least of which include acidic soil corroding bone long before it has a chance to petrified.
These Hylobatid apes essentially became the primate version of bears, being generalist omnivores that can tolerate even snowy climates. With this cold tolerance, crossing the Bering land bridge wouldn’t be all that difficult several million years later. They very well could have arrived at roughly the same time the likes of bison and mammoth did, being the first apes in the New World several hundreds of thousands or millions of years before humans.
However in the New World, while resources were ample, predators were also in abundance with both the homegrown New World variety and the influx from the Old World. Even a 7 to 9-foot tall ape would best be very wary of a pride of Smilodon sabretooths, or the 13+ foot Arctodus bears, or the large packs of dire wolves. Not to mention there would be large amounts of competition in the more open country these predators dwelt in, because it was occupied by a large menagerie of big herbivores. So, the solution would be obvious. Go where competition is less intense and the predators don’t get that big, back into the mountains, and the thicker deciduous forests and adopt avoidance strategies to be as reclusive as possible. There predators were smaller, competition was lessened, and it could remain safe and content.
This strategy might meet good success even if population numbers never become very dense. It would certainly be successful enough that when another bipedal ape immigrated into the New World with their canine companions some 22,000 years ago, the native apes were evasive enough to avoid humans even if they were outright hostile one way or another. And when the Pleistocene ended with the mass extinction event, most likely caused by a combination of ecological upsets humans were part of contributing to the disastrous effects of mass climate change, the giant Hylobatids managed to survive. In fact, they actually would find their home ranges expanding because the warmer, wetter climate was creating more dense forests where there had once been scrubby grassland.
Encounters between these hypothetical giant Hylobatids and humans would be rare, enough for plenty of native folklore to kick off from all manner of interactions, but the two would largely keep to their own domains. These First Nation storytellers would nonetheless recognize the similarity between themselves and their mysterious neighbors, and observation that is actually quite common across the world in Asia where Gibbons dwell. Ancient Chinese writers among others noticed the convergence similarities between gibbons and mankind, in contrast to monkeys and other great apes.
As a matter of fact, until concrete fossil evidence firmly established humans had their origins in Africa amongst the same great apes that gave rise to the gorilla and chimpanzee branches, many early paleontologists thought the similar skull sape and bipedal locomotion of gibbons and humans had to come from close relation and common origin. The skullcap of a Homo erectus discovered in Java was actually taken to be a giant gibbon skull for a short time by some until more complete remains were discovered.
And because staying in seclusion was a winning strategy, these giant, speculative Hylobatid made it a priority to avoid other threats if they could. Using a keen awareness and problem-solving intelligence that apes are adept at while humans are at a deficit (in exchange for better toolmaking and long-term memory intelligence), they would know when human was approaching long before the human would notice them unless they were taken by surprise. By the time the human approached, the ape would already know an escape route.


https://preview.redd.it/cof5pz9jurs51.png?width=587&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d10268ce1cb9ccf05be85a4c7671e0a22b8e4a5
Hylobatid evolution is infamously poorly studied among primatology and paleontology. I’ve had professors that considered it a ‘black hole’ of information in both subjects. So much detail is very poorly understood even in comparison to the relatively atrocious record some other apes like gorillas have. And if great apes could diversify to such an amazing degree in just a little over 10 million years, to the point the human line alone generated over half a dozen genera and dozens of species, who’s to say what was going on with the other side of a family?
Perhaps, just perhaps, something pretty big.
submitted by Torvosaurus428 to bigfoot

0 thoughts on “Spss statistics 17.0 crack fl

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *